often times the seemingly mundane can provide a great deal of insight

3.08.2010

dragon's milk and crude stereotypes

  
Story:

I was at The Happy Gnome last night... which is one of my favorite places in Saint Paul to enjoy good company and great beer.

While I was enjoying the evening with a couple of my buds we noticed that there was a bit of commotion at the bar.  Apparently the bartender had left a tap running and had to leave the bar for some unknown reason.

So there it sat...  A glass beginning to overflow with an adequately delicious stout called Dragon's Milk.  At first the dark liquid began spilling over the side of the glass and forming a pool at it's base.  The tap was only slightly open which added a dramatic note to this entire experience.  The pool began to swell as the light from the bar shimmered against the darkness of the beer and becamed framed by the deep burgundy wood of the bar.  It was both beautiful and tragic as the darkness began to cascade from the bar and spilled onto the floor.

As this took place, a number of observers began lamenting the tragic waste and felt helpless in their ability to intervene.  Patrons began squirming in their seats as agony and confusion began seeping in... until one man made the move.  A savior began his bold journey to a place where he did not belong, but does respect greatly.  As this man found himself behind the bar at The Happy Gnome he reached out and with one precisely coordinated gesture he caused the cascade of stout to recede. When my buddy made his way back to our booth, he was admired by all those who had witnessed the tragedy of the overflow and the heroic efforts of the one who would put an end to that tragedy.

The bartender, having seen the final moments of this heroic feat, even bought a drink for this man of greatness, and the night continued on as we sat together, enjoying good company and great beer.

Application:

Too often we remain merely the spectators... fully capable of making a difference but lacking the willingness to do so.  Arguably, those who pride themselves with the greatest moral values should also be the ones leading the way in physical acts of compassion, equality, and redemption.. yet, too often this is not the case.  We seem to either point out the problems and remain seated or ignore the problems because we are too focused on ourselves or those within our immediate circle.  Sadly, the large amount of cultural segregation between christian and unchristian often implies that those within the immediate circle of christian influence are christian.  We have become a very comfortable, incestuous, and self-centered product, for a movement based on a mandate to go and make disciples of all nations.

Here are some categories christians can fall into.

the ignorant christian:  Unaware of their surroundings, the ignorant christian has not been exposed to the needs that exist in the world.  They may be physically, mentally, or emotionally removed from such startling realities, but the fact remains they are ignorant to them.  Their lack of knowledge is likely do to a poor job of shepherding by their spiritual leader... these people are not necessarily in fault, for they know no better.. but if they do become aware of their call to follow Christ.. they can no longer claim ignorance as their guard.

the complacent christian: Unlike the ignorant christian, the complacent christian has become aware of the responsibilities included in following Christ.  They are now responsible to obey their mandate to administer love in tangible ways and to bring the truth of Christ to those who are still unchristian.  It is also quite likely they have become aware of the injustice that exists in this world.  The complacent christian chooses to not respond to these needs though.  Possibly because they feel overwhelmed, possibly because it is not a part of the christian sub-culture, possibly because they are not being shepherded in it.. regardless... they are aware and uninvolved.. they are responsible to act, and lack of their lack of action could be classify them as guilty of refusing their call.

the responsible christian: There is a thin line between the complacent christian and the responsible christian.  The responsible christian is the same as the complacent christian insofar as they are aware of their call to respond to the needs of the world and to be salt and light in the midst of a hurt and dying world.  The difference is that the responsible christian will provide lip service to the needs in the world and become an advocate for action.  They will speak of the importance of being outreached focused and even be able to tell you about the latest cool justice oriented ministry featured in Relevant Magazine. They have seen "Invisible Children" 8 times, and thought "Call and Response" was way cool and insightful.  They will voice their frustrations with the church and it's lack of movement... of which they are equally responsible.  You see, the responsible christian has taken on the guilt of the broken world and manifested it into a voice.. but nothing more than a voice.  They feel responsible, and to speak up is how their guilt is relieved.. they will still not take any physical steps forward in actually pursuing a lifestyle of justice and compassion, as that would inconvenience them.  They will claim that "outreach" is a specific gift... when in actuality it is the call of anyone who would claim to follow Christ.  They are responsible not because of their actions but because they feel responsible to do something.. and while that does raise awareness.. it only provides lip service and never moves beyond that to action.


the Christ following christian: Like the responsible christian, the Christ following christian is aware of the call of Jesus and the darkness in the world.  They are also advocates for taking action and are likely well connected with the same NGO's that the responsible christian is.  Unlike the responsible christian, the majority of raised awarenss comes not from the Christ followers words, but from their lifetstyles and their actions.  They are intentionally living out the call of Christ and have decided to follow the footsteps of the one the claim as Lord of their lives and the hope of their salvation.  They worship God with their actions and because of this they are willing to sacrifice for the cause of Christ.  "Outreach" might not even be a word in their vocabulary, for there is no clear distinction between when the are intentionally piercing into the heart of darkness and when they are living life.  They will still share about the importance of intentionally loving the broken and lost and displaying compassion while pursuing justice, but it is a natural result of the life they have decided to live and the God they have decided to serve.  The Christ following christian is arguably, but likely, the rarest of the four crude stereotypes, but these are the ones that are demonstrating a physical example of what it looks like to follow Christ.

There might be other categories, but I think this pretty well sums things up.

We need more people willing to take action, and most of us won't even work up the boldness to shut off a tap.

3.01.2010

duck, duck, gray duck: V2.0 - 3 sites reviewed

I don't normally do this, but thanks to an insightful reader I decided to rewrite this entry to clarify my initial reason for posting it. So, this is Version 2.0.

DUCK

I recently had a conversation with some friends of mine.

During this conversation a particular website was brought up.. at which point I shook my head, covered my face, and laughed due to mild disbelief and shock.

I had completely forgotten about this site and have not visited this site in a long time, but apparently it still exists.

The basic concept of the site is to ensure that sheltered christians remain as innocent as doves while being as "plugged in" as a fetus.  If you didn't catch it, I just referenced the website.... "Plugged In Online" created by "Focus on the Family""

Their mission statement is summarized as "shining a light on the world of popular entertainment"

for simplicity's sake, I will focus on the movie review portion of their site.

PROS

This site is meant to review media and it's content, allowing for people to be aware of what you might be viewing should you see a particular movie.  The site will typically begin with a quick synopsis of the movie and then move into a content description with categories such as; "Positive elements, spiritual content, sexual content, violent content, crude or profane language, and drug and alcohol content"  The review will typically end with the critics overall opinion of the film.

CONS
 
Nearly every movie review over a "G" rating can be summarized the same way... something like this,

"Would have been and amazing movie if it didn't have that worldly influence... what a shame... what a dirty, dirty shame... skip this one"

Ok, maybe that's not entirely accurate...some of the "G" rated movies are reviewed this way too. (that was a joke... take it easy)

Really though, this is what I think are the negative aspects of this online tool.  I am not opposed to having movie and music reviews done from a christian perspective and there is some great potential in this whole thing... the problem comes when it perpetuates the ever increasing physical and cultural separation between those who follow Christ, and those who don't.  Though christians have been called to a different standard of living we have also been engage with those outsideof the walls of the church... even if it means we hear a swear word or two.

This website seems to focus on a specific demographic, I might be wrong but it is probably used mainly by conservative christians, or conservative christians with children they would like to protect and likely have a fear of engaging with "the world".

 I am not super conservative and I don't have children, so I might perceive this site differently than it's intended audience... but, this is what i see as a potential shortcoming of the site...

We live in a story-telling culture.  One of the main ways that we now tell stories is through media... whether books, music, or film... it is now how we express our beliefs and values as a people. If what this tool does is mainly keep people from hearing others stories because their content causes fear, than I argue that we are disengaging from hearing the stories of the very people, as christians, we have been called to connect with.


 DUCK

 If you like YouTube but fear sinners, then you'll love...

GodTube

PROS

free online videos intended to offer a positive message.

CONS 

I see this site as the "testamints" of the internet.

It is nearly a comical parody of YouTube , and I am not sure it is necesary to slap a "jesus fish" on an already existing website.  Many, if not all of the videos presented on GodTube are also available on YouTube.  It disengages from the culture at large...   A bright light doesn't make much of an impact in an illuminated room but watch what happens in the midst of darkness, in the same way, I think a better use of the time and energy of people who care about GodTube would be to focus their energy in the YouTube world and share their videos and opinions there.  One of the YouTube features that draws attention and and allows for dialogue is the "comments" section, and I think that would be a better place to respectfully share opinions.

Pretty self explanatory, but once again... an example of what I think is an unnecessary segregation between the christian sub-culture and the culture it is supposed to be influencing.


GRAY DUCK

 Our third example looks a little different than the last two.

Musician Derek Webb is the founder of an online music site called noisetrade.

It is a revolutionary tool where fans can listen to and download good music for free... legally.

PROS

Although Derek is a Christian, the website is not limited to only christian artists!  Oh my!  Instead, it is a venue where artists are able to get their name and music spread to people who appreciate it and will likely support and promote them in the future.  It used to allow you to choose either telling 5 friends about the artist or paying what you want, but recently changed to download for free or pay what you'd like as a tip.

A christian artist founded a website that is beneficial to the music community while at the same time progressive.. and it does not go against christian values.  weird.

CONS

There are not enough christian influenced sites like this...



This is something I would like to see more of.  It is an example of christians providing a new way of doing things.. using our creativity and gifts to benefit others, being leaders in the arts and using our passions to show a different way.  I think that we have for too long limited ourselves to the DUCK approach... which is basically doing the same things as everyone else, just not as good and in a sheltered environment.  we need more GRAY DUCK ways of thinking... where we look different but it is good because we are the ones moving ahead and making a difference.

So, I recommend that you check all three of these sites out, I am admittedly quite critical, and there are probably some good things about all three if you are looking to find them.... but still i look forward to the time where there are more GRAY DUCKS out there... know of any others?


I know my initial review of the sites was pretty harsh, if you had the chance to read them, and some of it was intentionally over the top, and I am not trying to bash christians for standing up in their beliefs. 
I am trying to get the candles out of the fully illuminated rooms and into the darkness where they make a difference, and trying to encourage the salt to come out of the ocean. The more that talented christians use their gifts in the larger society, which is a culture consisting of an unchristian majority,  the more potential there is to have a positive influence and to actually shine lights in dark places. The first two sites, while very similar to other online sites, are an example of a christian site that is hoping to reach a majority christian audience... this in and of itself is not a bad thing.. It becomes a bad thing when the majority of sites by christians are aimed at christians, which is what has in fact happened... even my blog, momentum, falls into this category. The third site is aimed at a larger majority but still has christian influence and in the long run has a greater potential to reach people who are not proclaimed christians. This is what I think we need more of if we are to be effective in ministry.